Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=372800
 
 

Footnotes (352)



 


 



Coase's Paradox and the Inefficiency of Permanent Strike Replacements


Seth D. Harris


New York Law School

January 23, 2003

Washington University Law Quarterly, Vol. 80, February 2003

Abstract:     
This article considers the relationship between the National Labor Relations Act and Coase's Theorem. It concludes that the Coase Theorem cannot be used to justify and explain interpretations of the National Labor Relations Act. In particular, the article argues that the Coase Theorem cannot explain the rule derived from NLRB v. Mackay Radio Corporation permitting employers to permanently replace striking workers without violating the NLRA.

The article uses internal labor markets theory to reconsider a prominent Coasean analysis of the Mackay Radio doctrine. This article disagrees with that analysis' conclusion that Mackay Radio established an efficiency-enhancing rule of law. Since the Mackay Radio doctrine is an important and influential rule of American labor law, the Coase Theorem's inability to explain and justify the doctrine weakens its claim to relevance in NLRA interpretations.

This article also takes a broader approach to the relationship between the NLRA and the Coase Theorem building on new research from noted Princeton labor economist Alan Krueger and Alexandre Mas. Krueger and Mas established an association between Bridgestone/Firestone's hiring of permanent replacement workers during a 1995 strike at its Decatur, Illinois facility and the production of defective tires (principally tires used on Ford Explorers) that have hurt and killed consumers. This article argues that "secondary externalities" like the harm caused to Bridgestone/Firestone's customers must be included in any Coasean efficiency calculation. Taking secondary externalities into account, however, will frequently and necessarily result in the Coase Theorem's efficiency goal conflicting with the NLRA's command that employers and unions, not judges or the National Labor Relations Board, determine the substance of collective bargaining agreements. So, in this more fundamental sense, the Coase Theorem and the NLRA are incompatible.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 94

Keywords: labor, Labor Law, unions, strikes, Coase, Coase's Theorem, Transaction cost economics, internal labor markets, labor economics, strike replacements, National Labor Relations Act, NLRA

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 29, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Harris, Seth D., Coase's Paradox and the Inefficiency of Permanent Strike Replacements (January 23, 2003). Washington University Law Quarterly, Vol. 80, February 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=372800 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.372800

Contact Information

Seth D. Harris (Contact Author)
New York Law School ( email )
185 West Broadway
New York, NY 10013
United States
212-431-2826 (Phone)
212-431-3295 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,575
Downloads: 215
Download Rank: 84,804
Footnotes:  352

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds