Citations (4)


Footnotes (247)



An Outcomes Analysis of Scope of Review Standards

Paul R. Verkuil

Cardozo Law School

William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 68, p. 679, 2002

This article raises a question that is rarely asked: Do outcomes (reversal/affirmance/remand rates) on appeal from administrative decisions bear a predictable relationship to the relevant scope of review standard? It turns out that the answer is both yes and no and that in two very active review systems (district court review over Social Security disability and FOIA decisions) the results run counter to what one might surmise based on the relative intensity of the review standards. While conclusions are carefully and necessarily hedged, the subject yields hypotheses worthy of further analysis.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 85

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 30, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Verkuil, Paul R., An Outcomes Analysis of Scope of Review Standards. William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 68, p. 679, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=373561 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.373561

Contact Information

Paul Verkuil (Contact Author)
Cardozo Law School ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0310 (Phone)
212-790-0203 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,327
Downloads: 151
Download Rank: 135,613
Citations:  4
Footnotes:  247

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds