Lifting the 'Fog' of Internet Surveillance: How A Suppression Remedy Would Change Computer Crime Law
Orin S. Kerr
The George Washington University Law School
Hastings Law Journal, 2003
This Article argues that the rules of Internet surveillance law remain obscure and undeveloped because of the remedies Congress has chosen to enforce its statutory standards. By rejecting a suppression remedy and embracing aggressive civil penalties, Congress has ensured that courts only rarely encounter challenges to Internet surveillance practices - and when they do, the cases tend to be in civil cases between private parties that raise issues far removed from those that animated Congress to pass the statutes. As a result, the courts have not explained how the complex web of surveillance statutes apply in routine criminal cases, and the rare judicial decisions construing the statutes tend to confuse the issues, not clarify them. This article argues that Congress should add a statutory suppression remedy to lift the fog of Internet surveillance law, and that such a change would benefit both civil liberties and law enforcement interests alike.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 42
Keywords: Internet, surveillance, cybercrime
JEL Classification: K14
Date posted: January 30, 2003
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds