|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id377482. ; Size: 211K
|
|
Villainy and Felony: A Problem Concerning Criminalization
Leo Katz University of Pennsylvania Law School
Buffalo Criminal Law Review, July 2002
Abstract:
Etymology notwithstanding, not all seriously harmful villainies qualify as felonies. Or at least our moral intuition tells us that they should not. Traditional approaches to criminalization - like utilitarianism, the harm theory, legal moralism - have real trouble accounting for that, indeed have rarely even addressed it, and need to be revised somewhat to deal with it. But even if we know which harmful villainies we do not want to criminalize and why, we are still left with difficult and unexplored questions about whether we should let the non-criminalizable misconduct figure more indirectly in our application of criminal law doctrines, in determining for instance the scope of self-defense, or recklessness, or proximate causation, or necessity. Although this essay has dealt mostly with harmful misconduct, the analysis has implications as well for more familiarly hard-to-criminalize wrongdoing, like self-injurious behavior, and certain interactions between consenting adults.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33
Accepted Paper Series
Download This Paper
Date posted: February 5, 2003
Suggested CitationKatz, Leo, Villainy and Felony: A Problem Concerning Criminalization. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, July 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=377482 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.377482
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
|
|
|
|