Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (24)



 


 



Villainy and Felony: A Problem Concerning Criminalization


Leo Katz


University of Pennsylvania Law School


Buffalo Criminal Law Review, July 2002

Abstract:     
Etymology notwithstanding, not all seriously harmful villainies qualify as felonies. Or at least our moral intuition tells us that they should not. Traditional approaches to criminalization - like utilitarianism, the harm theory, legal moralism - have real trouble accounting for that, indeed have rarely even addressed it, and need to be revised somewhat to deal with it. But even if we know which harmful villainies we do not want to criminalize and why, we are still left with difficult and unexplored questions about whether we should let the non-criminalizable misconduct figure more indirectly in our application of criminal law doctrines, in determining for instance the scope of self-defense, or recklessness, or proximate causation, or necessity. Although this essay has dealt mostly with harmful misconduct, the analysis has implications as well for more familiarly hard-to-criminalize wrongdoing, like self-injurious behavior, and certain interactions between consenting adults.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 5, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Katz, Leo, Villainy and Felony: A Problem Concerning Criminalization. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, July 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=377482 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.377482

Contact Information

Leo Katz (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-898-9334 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,906
Downloads: 210
Download Rank: 71,145
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  24

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.391 seconds