|
||||
|
||||
A Transaction Cost Theory of Patent LawPaul J. HealdUniversity of Illinois College of Law; Bournemouth University - Centre for Intellectual Property Policy & Management (CIPPM) October 17, 2005 Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 66, p. 473, 2005 Abstract: Patent law is under-theorized in the sense that the predominating incentive-based justifications cannot by themselves adequately explain empirical evidence on patenting gathered by research economists. This article provides an alternative justification for patent law based on private transaction costs savings offered by patent law in comparison to alternative options available to those who wish to exploit information assets. In particular, it identifies striking parallels to corporate law as described in recent scholarship and shows how patents act as affirmative asset partitions, ameliorate significant team production problems, and encourage technology transfer. Even if the patent system provides no significant incentives to invent, it can be explained and justified in terms of transaction costs savings alone.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 40 Keywords: patents, transaction costs, new institutional economics, team production, asset partition, technology transfer, incentives JEL Classification: O3, H42, K00, L1 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 28, 2003Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds