|
||||
|
||||
The Ranking Properties of the Morningstar Risk-Adjusted Rating
Kevin C.H. Chiang University of Alaska Fairbanks - School of Management (SOM); Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge - Department of Finance Kirill Kozhevnikov University of Oregon - Department of Finance Craig H. Wisen University of Alaska Fairbanks - School of Management (SOM) March 14, 2003 Abstract: The study examines the ranking properties of the Morningstar risk-adjusted rating (RAR). We find that the RAR and the excess return from the CAPM regression yield similar star ratings. In contrast, we document systematic differences between the star ratings produced by the RAR and the excess return estimated from the Fama-French [1993] three factor model. Approximately 77% of domestic equity funds with a ten-year five-star Morningstar rating do not maintain their five stars under the null hypothesis of the Fama-French three factor model. The study concludes that the sole reliance upon the Morningstar star rating to select U.S. equity funds may not result in an optimal allocation across style categories for a multi-fund portfolio.
Keywords: Morningstar, Fund Rating JEL Classifications: G11 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: May 05, 2003 ; Last revised: May 05, 2003Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.141 seconds.