Faculty Perceptions and Readership Patterns of Finance Journals: A Global View
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Finance
Nickolaos G. Travlos
ALBA Graduate Business School
ALBA Graduate Business School; Aston University - Marketing Group
March 19, 2003
ALBA Working Paper
With an increased pressure to publish in internationally highly regarded journals, faculty evaluations frequently depend on journal rankings. Nonetheless, debates about journal rankings frequently arise since they do not take into account the underlying diversity of the finance research community. Therefore this study examines how contextual factors such as a researcher's geographical origin, research interests, seniority and journal affiliation may influence their journal quality perceptions and readership patterns. Our analysis is based on a worldwide sample of 862 finance academics where the perceived journal quality is measured across a number of dimensions, including journal familiarity, average rank position, percent of respondents who classify a journal as top tier, and readership. The results support that while there is remarkable consistency in identifying the top journals, for the remaining journals a significant variation on journal quality perceptions exists based on a researcher's geographic origin, research interests, seniority and journal affiliation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: Journal Rankings, Finance, Diversity
JEL Classification: M40, G00working papers series
Date posted: April 2, 2003
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.703 seconds