Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=389403
 
 

Citations (4)



 
 

Footnotes (1)



 


 



The Creeping Federalization of Corporate Law


Stephen M. Bainbridge


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law


Regulation, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 32-39, Spring 2003

Abstract:     
The collapse of Enron and WorldCom, along with only slightly less high profile scandals at numerous other U.S. corporations, has reinvigorated the debate over state regulation of corporate governance. Post-Enron, politicians and pundits called for federal regulation not just of the securities markets but also of internal corporate governance. As Congress and market regulators began implementing some of those ideas, there has been a creeping - but steady - federalization of corporate governance law. The NYSE'S new listing standards regulating director independence is one example of that phenomenon. Other examples appeared to little public debate in the sweeping Sarbanes-Oxley legislation. Taken individually, each of Sarbanes-Oxley's provisions constitutes a significant preemption of state corporate law. Taken together, they constitute the most dramatic expansion of federal regulatory power over corporate governance since the New Deal.

No one seriously doubts that Congress has the power under the Commerce Clause to create a federal law of corporations if it chooses. The question of who gets to regulate public corporations thus is not one of constitutional law but rather of prudence and federalism. In this essay, I advance both economic and non-economic arguments against federal preemption of state corporation law. Competitive federalism promotes liberty as well as shareholder wealth. When firms may freely select among multiple competing regulators, oppressive regulation becomes impractical. If one regulator overreaches, firms will exit its jurisdiction and move to one that is more laissez-faire. In contrast, when there is but a single regulator, exit is no longer an option and an essential check on excessive regulation is lost.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: corporations, corporate governance, federalism

JEL Classification: K22

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 31, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Bainbridge, Stephen M., The Creeping Federalization of Corporate Law. Regulation, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 32-39, Spring 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=389403 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.389403

Contact Information

Stephen Mark Bainbridge (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-206-1599 (Phone)
310-825-6023 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.professorbainbridge.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 11,070
Downloads: 1,295
Download Rank: 7,506
Citations:  4
Footnotes:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds