Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=390641
 
 

Footnotes (60)



 


 



Tax Practice and Privilege: A Tale of Two Countries


Joel S. Newman


Wake Forest University - School of Law

March 2003

Tax Notes, Vol. 99, No. 3, p. 422, April 2003

Abstract:     
A comparison of the British Morgan Grenfells case with the American KPMG case suggests that tax practitioner privileges are doing well in the UK and poorly in the US. In the UK, conflicts are few, and the privilege is viewed as a fundamental human right. The US, by contrast, is experiencing multi-layered conflicts - between lawyers and accountants, and between IRS and tax shelter promoters. The privilege here is a battle trophy, and is bound to be weakened by the fighting.

In Morgan Grenfells, the issue was whether Parliament had abrogated the legal professional privilege (LPP) in a tax statute. Pursuant to the principle of legality, Parliament can abrogate fundamental human rights only if it does so directly, or by necessary implication. Inland Revenue argued that, in protecting the LPP in certain narrow, specific instances, it followed by necessary implication that Parliament had intended to abrogate it in all other cases. Two lower courts agreed. The House of Lords, however, reversed, in a ringing reaffirmation of the LPP as a fundamental human right.

In KPMG, the court considered the tax practitioner privilege, IRC Sec. 7525. The statute provides that a communication with an accountant is privileged "to the extent the communication would be considered a privileged communication if it were between a taxpayer and an attorney." As interpreted by the KPMG court, that means that there is no privilege for materials supporting a tax return, and there is no privilege for business advice, as opposed to legal advice. Accountants couldn't possibly be giving legal advice, for, if they were, they would violate the unauthorized practice rules. Therefore, the tax advice given by accountants can't be privileged. Even worse, if tax advice given by accountants is not privileged, then the same tax advice given by lawyers is not privileged either. IRS, which considers itself to be "at war" against tax shelters, will not hesitate to use this argument aggressively. So much for the tax practitioner privilege.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: Taxation, Privilege, Professional Responsibility

JEL Classification: K34, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 31, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Newman, Joel S., Tax Practice and Privilege: A Tale of Two Countries (March 2003). Tax Notes, Vol. 99, No. 3, p. 422, April 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=390641 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.390641

Contact Information

Joel S. Newman (Contact Author)
Wake Forest University - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 7206
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,727
Downloads: 145
Download Rank: 117,694
Footnotes:  60

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.219 seconds