SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (3)

Beta

 
 

Footnotes (153)

Beta

 


 



Symbolism and Incommensurability in Civil Sanctioning: Decision Makers as Goal Managers

Jennifer K. Robbennolt
University of Illinois College of Law

John M. Darley
Princeton University

Robert MacCoun
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law; University of California, Berkeley - Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program; University of California, Berkeley - The Richard & Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy



Brooklyn Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Factfinders in civil cases must often make a constellation of decisions, such as assigning responsibility and blame, making compensation and (sometimes) giving out punishment. These decisions are likely to evoke numerous social and moral concerns and, therefore, inevitably implicate a variety of instrumental and symbolic goals. We argue that descriptions of legal decision making that fail to consider the psychological interplay among these different goals are likely to come up short in their efforts to explicate the ways in which jurors and other factfinders make decisions in civil cases. Instead, we suggest that decision making in civil cases can profitably be thought of as a process by which decision makers attempt to maximally satisfy a wide variety of goals in parallel. In contrast to many traditional legal and economic portrayals of legal decision making which posit that decision makers can pursue single motives as instructed, we argue that jurors and other finders-of-fact deciding civil cases ought to be thought of as pursuing many different goals simultaneously. We briefly describes many of the goals that may underlie decision making in civil cases and introduces a set of basic goal management principles that define how these goals interrelate. We next describe social psychological research that suggests that legal decision makers may be motivated to pursue a variety of goals in addition to the traditional goals of determining fault, compensating plaintiffs, and deterring defendants. Different motives for distributing resources, value expressive goals and a need to restore the proper relative moral balance between the parties may all play a role in civil decision making. Finally, we propose that decision makers may attempt to simultaneously satisfy these multiple goals through a process of parallel constraint satisfaction.

Keywords: legal decision making, civil justice, constraint satisfaction, factfinder goals

JEL Classifications: C45, K13, K4

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: April 24, 2003 ; Last revised: March 16, 2005

Suggested Citation

Robbennolt, Jennifer K., Darley, John M. and MacCoun, Robert, Symbolism and Incommensurability in Civil Sanctioning: Decision Makers as Goal Managers. Brooklyn Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=392683 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.392683


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Jennifer Robbennolt (Contact Author)
University of Illinois College of Law ( email )
504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
217-333-6623 (Phone)
John M. Darley
Princeton University ( email )
1-N-17 Green Hall
Princeton, NJ 08544
United States
609-258-3000 (Phone)
Robert MacCoun
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
510-642-7518 (Phone)
University of California, Berkeley - Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program ( email )
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
University of California, Berkeley - The Richard & Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy ( email )
2607 Hearst Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94720-7320
United States
510-642-7518 (Phone)
510-643-9657 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,136
Downloads: 161
Download Rank: 55,654
Citations: 3
Footnotes: 153

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.156 seconds.