Abstract

 
 

References (24)



 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Gains to Valuation Accuracy of Direct Valuation Over Industry Multiplier Approaches


Lucie Courteau


Free University of Bozen-Bolzano - School of Economics

Jennifer L. Kao


University of Alberta - Department of Accounting, Operations & Information Systems

Terry O'Keefe


University of Queensland - Accounting and Accountability; University of Oregon - Department of Accounting

Gordon D. Richardson


University of Toronto - Rotman School of Management

April 4, 2003


Abstract:     
The primary objective of this paper is to assess the gain in valuation accuracy when the analyst performs an exhaustive pro-forma about the target firm beyond the four-year forecast horizon under the direct method, compared to the alternative of using heuristic industry multiples to compute continuing values if she is uncertain about the firm's post-horizon prospects. We also examine the determinants of the edge to direct valuation vis-a-vis industry multiplier approaches.

Three industry-multiplier approaches are considered, the ETSS, IHP and PE4 models. Given variations in size and growth prospects across firms within an industry, we expect to achieve greater valuation accuracy under the direct method than any of the multiplier models that we explore in the study. Results from the study are consistent with this prediction. In particular, the direct method generates the lowest mean squared errors, tightest inter-percentile ranges and highest regression, when data are either un-scaled or deflated by current book value per share. The direct method loses some of its edge over the other models, however, when current stock price per share is used as a deflator. Results also indicate that the valuation gains to directly forecasting firm-specific continuing values are greatest for small and fast growing target firms from highly heterogeneous industries.

We contribute to the academic literature in three ways: first, we present a benchmark model against which the efficacy of various multiplier approaches may be evaluated; second, we identify firm characteristics and industries under which gains to direct forecasts of continuing value is greatest; third, we show the analyst and students of financial statement analysis how to use reverse engineering techniques to extract from comparable firms inferences about industry average growth prospects at the horizon.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

JEL Classification: G12, G29, M41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 2, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Courteau, Lucie, Kao, Jennifer L., O'Keefe, Terry and Richardson, Gordon D., Gains to Valuation Accuracy of Direct Valuation Over Industry Multiplier Approaches (April 4, 2003). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=393120 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.393120

Contact Information

Lucie Courteau
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano - School of Economics ( email )
School of Economics and Management
Via Sernesi 1
39100 Bozen-Bolzano (BZ), Bozen 39100
Italy
Jennifer L. Kao (Contact Author)
University of Alberta - Department of Accounting, Operations & Information Systems ( email )
Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R6
Canada
780-492-7972 (Phone)
780-492-3325 (Fax)

Terry O'Keefe
University of Queensland - Accounting and Accountability ( email )
Brisbane 4072, Queensland
Australia
University of Oregon - Department of Accounting ( email )
Lundquist College of Business
1208 University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403
United States
Gordon D. Richardson
University of Toronto - Rotman School of Management ( email )
105 St. George Street
Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6
Canada
416-946-8601 (Phone)
416-971-3048 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,739
Downloads: 624
Download Rank: 18,856
References:  24
Citations:  3

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.469 seconds