Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=393261
 
 

Citations



 


 



Inmate Litigation


Margo Schlanger


University of Michigan Law School


Harvard Law Review, Vol. 116, April 2003

Abstract:     
In 1995, prison and jail inmates brought about 40,000 new lawsuits in federal court - nearly a fifth of the federal civil docket. Court records evidence a success rate for inmate plaintiffs under fifteen percent. These statistics highlight two qualities long associated with the inmate docket: its volume and the low rate of plaintiffs' success. Then, in 1996, Congress enacted the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), which dramatically altered the litigation landscape, restricting inmates' access to federal court in a variety of ways. This Article examines inmate litigation before and after the PLRA.

Looking first at the litigation process itself, it brings together prior research, the results of new quantitative analysis of a comprehensive database of federal district court cases, and interviews and other qualitative inquiry. The Article canvasses filing trends, subject matter, and settled and litigated outcomes, exploring what is happening in each of these areas and why. Then it uses a variety of analytic tools to uncover and assess the PLRA's impact. Most obviously, the PLRA has shrunk the number of new federal filings by inmates by over forty percent, notwithstanding a large increase in the affected incarcerated population. Simultaneously, the statute seems to be making even constitutionally meritorious cases harder both to bring and to win. Finally, the Article looks beyond federal courthouses to the ways litigation affects jail and prison operations. Specifically, it explores agencies' efforts to respond efficiently to the high-volume, low-probability docket and to reduce their liability exposure, and offers some tentative observations about the PLRA's likely impact on these efforts. The Article suggests in conclusion that use of the PLRA as a model for broader litigation reforms should proceed with enormous caution given the statute's problematic effects.

Keywords: prison, jail, corrections, litigation, inmate litigation, civil rights litigation, pro se litigation, tort reform, prison litigation reform act

JEL Classification: K41, L32, H77

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: April 10, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Schlanger, Margo, Inmate Litigation. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 116, April 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=393261

Contact Information

Margo Schlanger (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,056

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.219 seconds