Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=394861
 
 

Citations (6)



 
 

Footnotes (304)



 


 



Lochner's Legacy's Legacy


David Bernstein


George Mason University School of Law


Texas Law Review, Vol. 92, p. 1, 2003
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-15

Abstract:     
Avoiding "Lochner's error" remains a primary focus of constitutional law and constitutional scholarship. Debate, however, continues regarding just what that error was. In Cass Sunstein's oft-cited 1987 Columbia Law Review article, Lochner's Legacy, Sunstein argues that the Lochner era Court's primary error was not its purported "judicial activism." Rather, the primary problem with Lochner was the Justices' belief that market ordering under the common law was part of nature rather than a legal construct, and formed a baseline from which to measure the constitutionality of state action, rendering redistributive regulations unconstitutional.

Lochner's Legacy's understanding of the Lochner era has been widely accepted in legal circles, including by four current Supreme Court Justices. As conservative and liberal Justices continue to battle over the meaning of Lochner and its significance for modern constitutional jurisprudence, the liberal Justices have adopted Lochner's Legacy's historical thesis.

This Article examines three major historical claims Lochner's Legacy makes about the Lochner era: (1) that the Lochner era Supreme Court understood the common law "to be part of nature rather than a legal construct"; (2) that the Lochner era Court sought to preserve what it saw as the "natural," "status quo" distribution of wealth against redistributive regulations; and (3) that the abandonment of Lochner resulted from the Supreme Court's recognition that the problem with Lochner and its progeny was that the Court in those decisions mistakenly treated government inaction as the "baseline" to determine the constitutionality of government regulations. This Article argues that all three of these propositions are demonstrably incorrect.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 19, 2003 ; Last revised: July 22, 2008

Suggested Citation

Bernstein, David, Lochner's Legacy's Legacy. Texas Law Review, Vol. 92, p. 1, 2003; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=394861 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.394861

Contact Information

David Eliot Bernstein (Contact Author)
George Mason University School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-8089 (Phone)
703-993-8202 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://mason.gmu.edu/~dbernste
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 8,238
Downloads: 663
Download Rank: 20,998
Citations:  6
Footnotes:  304

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds