|
||||
|
||||
Managerial Incentives and Corporate Fraud: The Sources of Incentives MatterShane A. JohnsonTexas A&M University - Department of Finance Harley E. Ryan Jr.Georgia State University - Department of Finance Yisong S. TianYork University - Schulich School of Business February 29, 2008 EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings Abstract: Operating and stock return results imply that managers that commit fraud likely anticipate large stock price declines if they do not misreport earnings. Stock price declines cause greater losses for managerial stockholdings than for option holdings because of differences in payoff convexity. Fraud firms have significantly greater incentives from unrestricted stockholdings than control firms do, and unrestricted stockholdings are the largest source of incentives at fraud firms. Collectively, these results emphasize the importance of the shape and vesting status of managerial incentive payoffs in providing incentives to commit fraud. Fraud firms also have characteristics that suggest a lower likelihood of fraud detection, which implies lower expected costs of fraud. Overall, the results are consistent with the economic theory of crime.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 40 Keywords: corporate fraud, incentives, stock options, executive compensation, governance JEL Classification: G34, K22, M41, J33 working papers seriesDate posted: June 2, 2006 ; Last revised: October 18, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.828 seconds