Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=397642
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (93)



 


 



Should the Model Penal Code's Mens Rea Provisions Be Amended?


Kenneth W. Simons


Boston University - School of Law


Ohio State Criminal Law Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1

Abstract:     
The Model Penal Code approach to mens rea was a tremendous advance. The MPC carefully defines a limited number of mens rea terms, firmly establishes element analysis in place of offense analysis, and recognizes that the doctrine of mistake is part and parcel of the basic analysis of mens rea.

However, a revised Code could improve the drafting of the mens rea provisions in a number of respects:

* Clarify how to distinguish result, circumstance, and result elements

* Simplify the definitions of knowledge and purpose

* Perhaps eliminate the category of mens rea as to conduct

* Clarify the fact/law distinction, and especially the distinction between two types of mistakes of law - mistakes of governing law and mistakes of legal element - that the MPC treats differently

* Clarify the meaning of the "reasonable person" test

* Clarify the definition of willful blindness

Moreover, more fundamental questions arise with the central concept of recklessness. A reckless actor is one who must be
aware of a "substantial and unjustifiable" risk; are these independent or interdependent requirements? What type or degree of consciousness is required? Of what, precisely, must the actor be aware? Does a strict "consciousness" requirement undermine the rule that ignorance of law is no excuse? And should consciousness extend to "latent" knowledge that the actor could call up if he were to consider the matter even for a moment?

Furthermore, does the MPC hierarchy always work? Is knowledge really always worse than recklessness? Is recklessness always worse than negligence? Should culpable indifference or a
similar mental state be added to the hierarchy? Are the MPC categories too cognitive, or too descriptive, or too rigid? Finally, the conclusion examines some theoretical and pragmatic implications of the analysis.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: mental state, mens rea, criminal law, Model Penal Code, reckless, recklessness

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 24, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Simons, Kenneth W., Should the Model Penal Code's Mens Rea Provisions Be Amended?. Ohio State Criminal Law Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=397642 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.397642

Contact Information

Kenneth W. Simons (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-4701 (Phone)
617-353-3077 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,286
Downloads: 288
Download Rank: 58,995
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  93

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds