Thinking Back on Where We're Going: A Methodological Assessment of Five Decades of Research in Negotiation Behavior
40 Pages Posted: 12 Jun 2003
Abstract
Through a content-analysis and coding of articles published in the mainstream academic literature on negotiation behavior, this study examines the field with respect to the research methods employed. A large database of relevant publications featured in Psychinfo is being constructed in order to investigate possible trends and patterns in the research methodologies used and abandoned over the past decades. We explore issues relating to research strategy, measurement, types of respondents, data-analytical procedures etc., and address various aspects of internal, external and construct validity. Our aim is to gain insight into the dominant methodological and statistical practices that have shaped the field of negotiation, and shed light on possible gaps and trade-offs. Preliminary findings, based on a set of 862 studies, are presented.
Keywords: Conflict, negotiation, research methods, meta-analysis
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
What Do People Value When They Negotiate? Mapping the Domain of Subjective Value in Negotiation
By Jared R. Curhan, Hillary Anger Elfenbein, ...
-
Are Some Negotiators Better than Others? Individual Differences in Bargaining Outcomes
By Hillary Anger Elfenbein, Jared R. Curhan, ...
-
By Emily T. Amanatullah, Michael Morris, ...
-
Good Karma: How Individuals Construct Schemas of Reputation in Negotiation Contexts
By Nathan Goates, Bruce Barry, ...
-
By Jared R. Curhan, Margaret Neale, ...
-
By Jared R. Curhan, Hillary Anger Elfenbein, ...
-
The Objective Value of Subjective Value: A Multi-round Negotiation Study
By Jared R. Curhan, Hillary Anger Elfenbein, ...
-
Negotiator Satisfaction in Face-to-Face and Electronically Mediated Negotiations
-
The Polarizing Effect of Arousal on Negotiation
By Ashley D. Brown and Jared R. Curhan