Credibility of Management Forecasts
Jonathan L. Rogers
University of Colorado at Boulder - Leeds School of Business
Phillip C. Stocken
Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth
Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Paper No. 07-02
We examine how the market's ability to assess the truthfulness of management earnings forecasts affects the extent to which managers bias their forecasts, and we evaluate whether the market's response to management forecasts is consistent with it identifying the predictable bias in forecasts. We find that managers more likely to face litigation release less optimistic forecasts than managers less likely to face litigation, and this incentive is dampened when it is more difficult to detect whether managers have misrepresented their forward-looking information. Further, when it is more difficult to detect forecast bias, we find that managers are more likely to offer forecasts that increase their profits from insider transactions and managers of financially distressed firms are more optimistic than those of healthy firms. With regard to the stock price response to forecasts, we find the market's immediate response varies with the predictable bias in good but not bad news forecasts. The market's subsequent response, however, is consistent with investors eventually identifying the bias in bad news forecasts and modifying their valuation of the firm in the appropriate direction.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 51
Keywords: voluntary disclosure, credibility, management forecasts, insider trading, litigation
JEL Classification: M41, M45, D82, G14
Date posted: May 27, 2003
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds