Selling Mayberry: Communities and Individuals in Law and Economics
University of Pennsylvania Law School; Bar Ilan University - Faculty of Law
University of Connecticut - School of Law
California Law Review, Vol. 92, pp. 75, 2004
U of Penn. Law School, Public Law Working Paper 28
U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 03-08
The small village of Cheshire, Ohio was recently acquired in its entirety by the firm whose giant power plant, located at the edge of town, caused it serious pollution problems. Although the plant was worth substantially more than the town, this was not a simple Coasean bargain. This paper combines an ethnographic methodology with theoretical insights from law and economics to present an empirical and theoretic challenge to the standard account of nuisance disputes. We explore the transaction in detail and explain what prevented collective action and holdout problems that are usually thought to hinder bargaining with groups. Specifically, we show how incorporating the role of community into conventional theory offers a new understanding of the likelihood of holdouts, the importance of community dynamics, the interdependency of community-wide nuisance actions, and the role of the law of takings.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 72
Keywords: pollution, nuisance, property, torts, community, externalities, takings
Date posted: May 12, 2003 ; Last revised: December 13, 2009
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.109 seconds