Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=405120
 
 

References (43)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Judging Unions' Future Using a Historical Perspective: The Public Policy Choice Between Competition and Unionization


Michael L. Wachter


University of Pennsylvania Law School - Institute for Law and Economics

December 2002

U of Penn., Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper 03-09; U of Penn. Law School, Public Law Working Paper 45

Abstract:     
In this paper I look at unions' future using a historical perspective and focusing on the period of union ascendancy as well as the past few decades when unions have been in decline. We know trends currently in place are unfavorable to unions. What conditions would be favorable? The rise of unions from the 1930s through the early 1950s was due to the convergence of a number of events - an economic policy that attempted to restrict competition beginning in the 1930s, the twin beliefs that labor markets were inherently noncompetitive and/or that individual workplaces were exploitative, and low union premiums. The passage of highly favorable legislation, in the form of the Wagner Act, was a reflection of the idea that unions could actually improve the functioning of labor markets and serve as a countervailing power to big business. Over the past several decades, union density declined because government policy became pro-competitive, it became clearer that labor markets were relatively competitive, HR practices developed that reduced the amount of opportunistic behavior of employers, and unions increased the percentage premium they enjoyed in industries where rents were available. In this environment, the public-good aspect of labor unions - their ability to improve the functioning of labor markets - was called into question. The passage of amendments to the NLRA that were unfavorable to unions was a reflection of this changed sentiment as to the public good aspect of unions as well as to the adoption of pro-competitive market policies in general. Consequently the future trend in union density will depend on the competitiveness of the economy and on the related question of the number of opportunities for unions to fulfill their major goal of either extracting economic rents or remedying market failures that result in exploitative employment relationships.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: labor unions, conditions favoring unions, union density

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 12, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Wachter, Michael L., Judging Unions' Future Using a Historical Perspective: The Public Policy Choice Between Competition and Unionization (December 2002). U of Penn., Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper 03-09; U of Penn. Law School, Public Law Working Paper 45. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=405120 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.405120

Contact Information

Michael L. Wachter (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School - Institute for Law and Economics ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-898-7852 (Phone)
215-573-2025 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,964
Downloads: 314
Download Rank: 53,325
References:  43
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.328 seconds