Footnotes (74)



Overcoming Temptations to Violate Human Dignity in Times of Crisis: On the Possibilities for Meaningful Self-restraint

Steven R. Ratner

University of Michigan Law School

U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 53

The codification of key instruments of international human rights law and international humanitarian law, and the accession to those treaties by a large majority of states, does not, at least at first glance, seem to have any significant effect upon states' behavior in situations of crisis. Any understanding of the prospects for such law in these situations requires an appraisal of both the motivations of states in concluding these treaties and the pressures on them to ignore them. This paper analyzes those motivations and temptations through the framework of precommitment theory, a component of rational choice theory, originally articulated by Jon Elster and Thomas Schelling. The metaphor of Ulysses offers a useful way to address three different dimensions of the purposes that states join treaties: (1) beliefs, i.e., the state's attitude toward the norms in the treaty; (2) predictions, the state's concerns about its own future behavior; and (3) interactions, i.e., the extent to which the state is trying to influence or bind other states. And it permits linking those motivations to the propensity of states to comply at a later time. The paper offers a four-part typology for why states commit to such treaties, contrasting it with notions from contemporary international relations theories. It then explores the contrasting approaches of compliance theories and international law doctrine to the temptation of states to violate treaties and elaborates the contributions of the precommitment framework. Building upon that framework, it proposes a set of strategies that those concerned with compliance might explore for making international law more relevant when governments seem most inclined to discount it.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 15, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Ratner, Steven R., Overcoming Temptations to Violate Human Dignity in Times of Crisis: On the Possibilities for Meaningful Self-restraint. U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 53. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=405401 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.405401

Contact Information

Steven R. Ratner (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,314
Downloads: 246
Download Rank: 92,792
Footnotes:  74

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds