Abstract

 


 



Comment: The Engler-Knoll Consumption Tax Proposal: What Transition Rule Does Fairness (or Politics) Require?


Joseph Bankman


Stanford Law School


Southern Methodist University Law Review, 2003

Abstract:     
This commentary on the Engler-Knoll proposal on transitioning from an income tax system to a consumption tax system argues that full transition relief is unfair because it "overcompensates holders of capital, exacerbates unequal distribution of wealth, and reduces welfare." While acknowledging that the Engler-Knoll proposal is ingenious, the commentary argues that a cash flow tax with limited transition relief and lower rates is more likely to be enacted than the Engler-Knoll proposal.

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: May 8, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Bankman, Joseph, Comment: The Engler-Knoll Consumption Tax Proposal: What Transition Rule Does Fairness (or Politics) Require?. Southern Methodist University Law Review, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=405721

Contact Information

Joseph Bankman (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
650-725-3825 (Phone)
650-725-7663 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 383

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.312 seconds