Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=410547
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (174)



 


 



An Exclusive Right to Evoke


Stacey L. Dogan


Boston University - School of Law


Boston College Law Review, Vol. 44, 2003

Abstract:     
Ten years ago, in White v. Samsung Electronics America, the Ninth Circuit held that a robot violated Vanna White's publicity rights. Since the White decision, the tendency to equate evocation with infringement in trademark and right of publicity cases has only grown. In contrast to this expansionist trend in trademark and right of publicity law, however, courts in recent copyright cases have arguably backed off from a strong right to evoke. This Article identifies these trends and suggests some reasons for concern over an exclusive right to evoke. The author argues that if we wish to preserve a rich commons and avoid significantly chilling free expression, courts should at least cabin the right to evoke and ensure that, when utilized, it serves the law's normative goals.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: trademark, right of publicity, copyright

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 27, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Dogan, Stacey L., An Exclusive Right to Evoke. Boston College Law Review, Vol. 44, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=410547 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.410547

Contact Information

Stacey L. Dogan (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,050
Downloads: 149
Download Rank: 111,228
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  174

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds