Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=410760
 


 



Fetal Pain Legislation: Is it Viable?


Teresa Stanton Collett


University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota)


Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 30, pp. 161-184, 2003

Abstract:     
Whether a human fetus experiences pain during an abortion has been the subject of heated debate within medical, legal, and political circles for over two decades. In the 1980's President Reagan's statement that "when the lives of the unborn are snuffed out [by abortion], they often feel pain, pain that is long and agonizing," and the release of a controversial film entitled "The Silent Scream" were merely two of the events that kept this issue in public view. Federal and state legislative efforts to enact "partial birth abortion bans" have reignited public debate over fetal pain." Three years ago, the argument intensified when the world caught a glimpse of life within the womb through the picture of Samuel Armas' tiny hand apparently grasping the finger of the perinatal surgeon who was repairing the spine of the twenty-one week old fetus. As the twenty-first century begins, there are some indications that advances in medical knowledge are resolving the debate in medical circles surrounding fetal pain, and the resolution favors its acknowledgment at some point prior to birth.

The purpose of this article is to explore the nature and extent of the medical community's emerging consensus on the issue of fetal pain, and consider whether this consensus should be reflected in American law. Part I discusses the current state of medical knowledge regarding fetal experiences of pain. Part II describes recent changes in medical standards to acknowledge the possibility of fetal pain. The legal status of laws directed at minimizing or protecting the human fetus from pain under the United States Constitution is discussed in Part III. Common objections to fetal pain legislation are identified and answered in Part IV. This article concludes with a call for legal requirements that women seeking abortions be informed of the possibility that the fetus may experience pain after twelve weeks gestation, and offered fetal anesthetic or modified abortion procedures to minimize any possibility of fetal pain.

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: June 3, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Collett, Teresa Stanton, Fetal Pain Legislation: Is it Viable?. Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 30, pp. 161-184, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=410760

Contact Information

Teresa Stanton Collett (Contact Author)
University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota) ( email )
MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN Minnesota 55403-2015
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 731

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds