Education, Growth and Income Inequality
Coen N. Teulings
University of Amsterdam - SEO Economic Research; Tinbergen Institute; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research); Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Thijs Van Rens
University of Warwick - Department of Economics; CEPR; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3863
Estimates of the effect of education on GDP (the social return to education) have been hard to reconcile with micro-evidence on the private return. We present a simple explanation that combines two ideas: Imperfect substitution between worker types and endogenous skill-biased technological progress. When types of workers are imperfect substitutes, the supply of human capital is negatively related to its return, and a higher education level compresses wage differentials. We use cross-country panel data on income inequality to estimate the private return and GDP data to estimate the social return. The results show that the private return falls by 1.5 percentage points when the average education level increases by a year, which is consistent with Katz and Murphy's (1992) estimate of the elasticity of substitution between worker types. We find no evidence for dynamics in the private return, and certainly not for a reversal of the negative effect as described in Acemoglu (2002). The short-run social return equals the private return, but the long-run return is two times higher, providing evidence in favour of endogenous technological progress. The rise in education is the major cause of productivity growth over the sample period 1960-90.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 47
Keywords: Education, inequality, growth
JEL Classification: E20, J24, O10, O15working papers series
Date posted: June 5, 2003
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.859 seconds