Abstract

 
 

References (10)



 
 

Citations (8)



 


 



Rethinking the Structure of Accounting and Auditing


Shyam Sunder


Yale University - School of Management

May 2003

Yale ICF Working Paper No. 03-17

Abstract:     
Failures in corporate governance of many major US corporations in 2002 suggest that it may be useful to fundamentally rethink the structure of institutions of accounting, auditing, corporate governance and executive compensation. Replacement of the system of authoritative standards by a competitive, common law approach to accounting principles and rules may help shift the focus of financial reporting from form to substance. Following some key Supreme Court rulings, the quality of auditing declined under the governmental push to increase competition in that industry beginning with the late seventies, pushing audit firms to peddle consulting services to their clients for economic survival. Restoring the high quality of audit may require radical reorganization of the audit function, such as bundling it with insurance. The protection of minority interest by the board of directors and the control of runaway executive compensation are two other problems whose solution may require structural, not just procedural, changes.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: Accounting, Auditing, Regulation, Institutional Reform

JEL Classification: G28, L44, L51, L84, M41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 13, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Sunder, Shyam, Rethinking the Structure of Accounting and Auditing (May 2003). Yale ICF Working Paper No. 03-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=413581

Contact Information

Shyam Sunder (Contact Author)
Yale University - School of Management ( email )
135 Prospect Street
P.O. Box 208200
New Haven, CT 06520-8200
United States
203-432-6160 (Phone)
203-432-6974 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.som.yale.edu/faculty/sunder/
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 9,862
Downloads: 2,440
Download Rank: 2,005
References:  10
Citations:  8

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.437 seconds