Audit Strategies and Multiple Fraud Opportunities of Misreporting and Defalcation
Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) - Kelley School of Business
First Principles Consulting, LLC
We examine how an auditor assesses the risk of fraud and formulates an audit plan when the auditee has the opportunity to commit various types of fraud. Unlike previous studies, the auditee can misappropriate assets (also called defalcation), misreport financial information (also called fraudulent financial reporting), or misreport financial information in combination with defalcation. Our results identify four possible equilibria whose characteristics depend on the auditee's relative rewards and penalties from the various types of fraud, the cost of audit effort and expectations about the auditee-firm's performance. When the cost of audit effort is sufficiently small, fraud risk assessment depends on the auditee's rewards and penalties associated with each type of fraud, but not on the auditor's beliefs about firm performance. The auditor develops an audit plan that focuses on the type of fraud the auditee is most motivated to commit, and in turn, the audit plan deters all other types of fraud.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 38
Keywords: defalcation, misreporting, audit strategy, fraud
JEL Classification: C72, M41, M43, M49, G38working papers series
Date posted: July 21, 2003
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.563 seconds