Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=416320
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (60)



 


 



Appellate Courts Inside and Out


Maxwell L. Stearns


University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law


George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-28

Abstract:     
In "Inside Appellate Courts: The Impact of Court Organization on Judicial Decision Making in The United States Courts of Appeals" (Michigan 2002), Jonathan Matthew Cohen, a sociologist and practicing attorney, asks a question that has received scant attention in the academic commentary on appellate judging: If we accept the dominant conception of appellate court judging as a process of atomistic contemplation, how do federal circuit court judges continue to maintain high quality opinions in the face of pervasively growing judicial dockets? Cohen advances the provocative thesis that increasing workloads have not prevented appellate judges from producing high quality outputs, but rather, that the dominant image of appellate judging as an isolated contemplative task is conceptually flawed. A better approach, Cohen argues, is to compare the task of appellate court judging to production within a multi-divisional private firm. While Cohen recognizes the inherent limits of his analogy, and in particular, that unlike private firms, circuit courts lack a central coordinating authority, he nonetheless contends that it is more fruitful to consider the judges in the manner of workers in a complex organization than as autonomous actors reflecting in isolation on the legal issues presented on appeal.

In this review essay, Stearns considers three complementary methodologies for analyzing appellate courts that yield insights of particular interest to lawyers and legal scholars. Such questions include how appellate courts transform preferences into doctrine; the nature of cases that are likely susceptible to further appellate process through en banc, mini-en banc, or Supreme Court review; and how best to evaluate appellate court opinions. While organizational theory provides a useful starting point, Stearns contends that insights drawn from other methodologies, including economics (demonstrating how decentralized informational processes can provide more meaningful data), probability analysis (demonstrating the quality of data drawn from subsets of a larger group), and social choice (demonstrating the nature and limits of group decision making), might prove more fruitful in evaluating at least some of these questions. Stearns concludes that a comprehensive understanding of federal appellate judging requires not only an understanding of the circuit courts' internal organizational structure, but also an analysis of the edifice of circuit court decision making from inside and out.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence, Legal Philosophy

JEL Classification: K00, K19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 16, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Stearns, Maxwell L., Appellate Courts Inside and Out. Michigan Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=416320 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.416320

Contact Information

Maxwell L. Stearns (Contact Author)
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law ( email )
500 West Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201-1786
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,884
Downloads: 176
Download Rank: 95,262
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  60

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.313 seconds