Citations (8)


Footnotes (483)



The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional Myths and the Case for Caution

Orin S. Kerr

The George Washington University Law School

102 Michigan Law Review 801 (2004).

This article argues that courts should approach the Fourth Amendment with caution when technology is in flux. When a technology is new or developing rapidly, courts should adopt modest formulations of Fourth Amendment protections that recognize the effectiveness and institutional advantages of statutory privacy protections.

The cautious approach is justified on three grounds. First, caution is consistent with existing judicial practice. The reasonable expectation of privacy test generally has been used by the courts as a term of art that remains closely tied to property law concepts. When a technology implicates privacy but not property, current judicial practice tends to avoid broad interpretations of the Fourth Amendment.

Second, legislative privacy protections are significantly stronger than most commentators appreciate. The case of wiretapping is instructive. While Fourth Amendment scholars often view wiretapping as a constitutional field under Katz v. United States and Berger v. New York, wiretapping has long been a primarily statutory field. Even today, wiretapping practice is governed by statutory commands, not constitutional ones. More broadly, Congress has created a wide range of statutory privacy laws that protect privacy in developing technologies where the courts have declined to offer protection.

Third, legislatures have considerable institutional advantages that enable the legislative privacy rules regulating new technologies to be more balanced, comprehensive, and effective than judicially created rules. Rapid technological change makes it difficult for courts to clarify the law. Courts also lack the institutional capacity to readily appreciate existing technology and the impact of different legal rules. In contrast, courts are well equipped to respond to technological change in the context of criminal procedure rules.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 83

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, privacy, technology, Katz

JEL Classification: K10, K14, K42

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 28, 2004 ; Last revised: July 13, 2015

Suggested Citation

Kerr, Orin S., The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional Myths and the Case for Caution. 102 Michigan Law Review 801 (2004). . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=421560

Contact Information

Orin S. Kerr (Contact Author)
The George Washington University Law School ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-4775 (Phone)
202-994-9817 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.gwu.edu/Faculty/profile.aspx?id=3568

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 18,013
Downloads: 1,527
Download Rank: 6,622
Citations:  8
Footnotes:  483

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.313 seconds