|
||||
|
||||
Optimal Toeholds in Takeover ContestsEitan GoldmanIndiana University Bloomington - Department of Finance Jun QianBoston College - Finance Department; University of Pennsylvania - Wharton Financial Institutions Center; China Academy of Financial Research (CAFR) March 2004 Abstract: In this paper we offer an explanation for the empirical anomaly that most raiders do not acquire the maximum possible toehold prior to announcing a takeover bid. By endogenously modeling the target value following an unsuccessful takeover we demonstrate that a raider may optimally choose to acquire a small toehold even if the toehold acquisition does not drive up the pre-tender offer target price. This occurs because although a large toehold increases profits if the takeover succeeds it also conveys a higher level of managerial entrenchment, and hence a lower firm value, if the takeover fails. In the paper we derive new predictions regarding how the optimal toehold and how target firm value following a failed takeover vary in the cross section. Extending the basic model we examine the impact of the presence of a rival bidder and of dilution on the initial bidder's toehold strategy.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 43 Keywords: Toehold, entrenchment, free-rider problem, takeover, tender offer JEL Classification: G34, D8, K22 working papers seriesDate posted: August 3, 2003Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.766 seconds