Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=422621
 
 

Footnotes (185)



 


 



Free Speech, Strict Scrutiny, and Self-Help: How Technology Upgrades Constitutional Jurisprudence


Tom W. Bell


Chapman University, The Dale E. Fowler School of Law


Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 743, 2003

Abstract:     
Self-help plays a nearly unnoticed but increasingly important role in free speech jurisprudence. Under both the compelling interest and least restrictive means prongs of strict scrutiny, courts have determined the constitutionality of content-based restrictions on speech by comparing the efficacy of state action to that of alternative, self-help remedies. Courts and commentators, however, have yet to explore and justify how self-help does and should influence First Amendment law. Thanks largely to the obscuring effect of the captive audience doctrine, courts have invoked self-help in compelling interest inquiries in a consistent, but only implicit, manner. In contrast, although the Supreme Court has encouraged lower courts to consider self-help remedies as part of that inquiry, the Court itself has given similar consideration only very recently. The present paper thus analyzes the extant case law to reveal how self-help has powerfully affected free speech strict scrutiny jurisprudence. The paper moreover justifies self-help's role as consistent with a fundamental principle of governance: political entities should undertake only those projects that they can accomplish more effectively than can private ones. Evaluations of the relative efficacy of political and private means will change with the relevant facts, of course. As a general matter, however, technological advances giving private parties increasingly refined means of manipulating information should lead courts to reduce the permissible scope of state action. Just as we upgrade computer software to benefit from progressively better hardware, in other words, we should upgrade First Amendment jurisprudence to benefit from progressively better self-help.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: free speech, strict scrutiny, self-help, first amendment

JEL Classification: K1, K3

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 3, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Bell, Tom W., Free Speech, Strict Scrutiny, and Self-Help: How Technology Upgrades Constitutional Jurisprudence. Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 743, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=422621 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.422621

Contact Information

Tom W. Bell (Contact Author)
Chapman University, The Dale E. Fowler School of Law ( email )
One University Drive
Orange, CA 92866-1099
United States
714-628-2503 (Phone)
714-628-2576 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.tomwbell.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,493
Downloads: 128
Download Rank: 134,719
Footnotes:  185

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.359 seconds