SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (16)

Beta

 
 

Footnotes (177)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Valuable Patents

John R. Allison
University of Texas at Austin - Department of Information, Risk and Operations Management

Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School

Kimberly A. Moore
affiliation not provided to SSRN

R. Derek Trunkey
CBO; GW Department of Economics



Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 92, p. 435, 2004
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-31
UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 133

Abstract:     
While the theory of the patent system is premised on the idea that patents will be used to exclude competitors, only a tiny fraction of patents are ever enforced. Legal and economic scholars have theorized as to how to identify valuable patents based on their individual characteristics. In this paper, we present the results of the largest empirical study ever conducted of the patent system. We compare the characteristics of litigated patents to those of issued patents generally, and we find important differences in a range of dimensions. These data confirm some predictions in the literature regarding patent value and refute others. New patents are more likely to be litigated than old patents. Foreign patent owners are less likely to litigate than domestic patent owners. Patents that issue to individuals or small companies are much more likely to be litigated than those that issue to big companies, though many of those patents have changed hands by the time they are brought to court. Patents that cite more prior art are more likely to be litigated, and those that are litigated tend to be cited more elsewhere. Most significantly, there are substantial differences between industries in the likelihood of patent litigation. Patents in the mechanical, computer, and medical device industries are significantly more likely to be litigated, for example, than patents in the chemical and semiconductor industries.

In the paper, we explore the implications of these findings in detail. Taken together, the data give a profile of a few valuable patents that stand out from a field of ordinary ones. They are the patents that their owners spend the most time and money in prosecuting. They are the ones that competitors recognize as most important. They are concentrated in a few industries in which patents play a more significant role in encouraging innovation. And they are patents that issue to individuals or small companies with asymmetric stakes in patent litigation, not to large companies. These conclusions in turn have significant implications for the design of the patent system, patent reform efforts and patent valuation theories - implications we consider at the end of the paper.

Keywords: patents, patent valuation, patent litigation, intellectual property

Working Paper Series

Date posted: July 30, 2003 ; Last revised: May 03, 2007

Suggested Citation

Allison, John R., Lemley, Mark A., Moore, Kimberly A. and Trunkey, R. Derek, Valuable Patents. Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 92, p. 435, 2004; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-31; UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 133. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=426020 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.426020


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Mark A. Lemley (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
John R. Allison
University of Texas at Austin - Department of Information, Risk and Operations Management ( email )
Austin, TX 78712
United States
Kimberly A. Moore
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Robert Derek Trunkey
CBO ( email )
Ford House Office Building
2nd & D Streets, SW
Washington, DC 20515-6925
United States
202 226 2916 (Phone)
202 226 1960 (Fax)
GW Department of Economics ( email )
1922 F Street, NW
Old Main, Suite 208
Washington, DC 20052
United States
703-585-6048 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 11,921
Downloads: 2,004
Download Rank: 1,421
Citations: 16
Footnotes: 177

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.156 seconds.