|
||||
|
||||
Gluttony and Sloth vs. BlissHeather BednarekSaint Louis University - Department of Economics Thomas D. JeitschkoMichigan State University - Department of Economics Rowena PeccheninoNUI Maynooth - Department of Economics July 2003 Abstract: In a model of rational agent choice, in which agents value consumption and leisure as well as health, we establish that individuals, unconstrained by concerns of income or time, can and will choose levels of consumption and leisure that exceed their physiological optima. By how much they exceed the optima depends on a variety of factors, most importantly, the utility cost (benefit) of achieving health. Observed positive trends in adult weight, brought on by higher levels of consumption and lower levels of physical activity, often interpreted as a public health crisis in the making, can be explained by these factors. But, rather than the trend suggesting crisis, it suggests only optimal responses to altered, and perhaps improved, circumstances. While individuals today, all else equal, may weigh more than those a generation or two ago, they are also happier.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34 Keywords: Obesity, Overweightness, Economics of Obesity, Consumption Choices, Budget Allocation, Leisure Choices, Time Allocation, Economic Development, Technological Change JEL Classification: I1, I12, I18, D1, D11, J2, O1, O3 working papers seriesDate posted: July 28, 2003Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.360 seconds