Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=426862
 
 

Footnotes (131)



 


 



War and the Constitutional Text


John Yoo


University of California at Berkeley School of Law; American Enterprise Institute


University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 69, No. 4, Fall 2002

Abstract:     
This Essay, written as a response to a pro-Congress view in the war powers debate, presents a complete textual and structural theory of a flexible approach to war powers. Under this system, the President possesses the power to initiate and conduct hostilities as commander-in-chief and chief executive under Article II of the Constitution, checked by Congress's power of the purse. The Declare War Clause simply confers on Congress juridical power to both define the United States's legal relations with other countries and trigger domestic constitutional authorities during wartime. How the nation goes to war will result form the interaction of the political branches using these plenary constitutional powers. The Response critiques the most recent pro-Congress account, offered by Professor Ramsey, for not addressing the full context of the framing, and next argues that constitutional text and structure actually support the flexible war powers system. Critics of this approach fail to appreciate the textual significance of the authority independently granted to the President by the Commander-in-Chief and Executive Power Clauses and the "engage in war" language of Article I, Section 10. In addition, they do not appreciate the manner in which the Constitution structures the interaction of the executive and legislative branches by creating strict processes with carefully defined roles for the President and Congress, as with the enactment of legislation, in contrast to areas where it does not, as with warmaking. A more comprehensive reading of the text and structure demonstrates that the Constitution does not mandate a specific, legalistic process for waging war. Instead, the Constitution vests the executive and legislative branches with different powers involving war, which the president and Congress may use to cooperate or to compete for control over warmaking.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: Constitutional law, War, Foreign relations, Separation of powers, Presidential power

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 9, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Yoo, John, War and the Constitutional Text. University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 69, No. 4, Fall 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=426862 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.426862

Contact Information

John Choon Yoo (Contact Author)
University of California at Berkeley School of Law ( email )
Boalt Hall
890 Simon
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
510-643-5089 (Phone)
510-643-2673 (Fax)
American Enterprise Institute ( email )
1150 17th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,640
Downloads: 755
Download Rank: 17,711
Footnotes:  131

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds