Toward Meaningful Cable Competition: Getting Beyond the Monopoly Morass
University of San Francisco - School of Law
New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, Vol. 6, p. 245, 2003
This article argues that poor regulation has thwarted competition among cable providers. It begins by laying out the history of cable regulation to show that the regulatory framework was created by a series of ad hoc, often contradictory, policies. It then surveys the markets for video programming and broadband access to show that precious little competition exists today. Moving to an economic analysis of the industry, it highlights the surprising irony that despite years of anti-competitive maneuvering, even the incumbent players are facing financial uncertainty. The paper also proposes a new regulatory paradigm based on economic and technological reality. Finally, it discusses the legal authority to implement such a framework, addressing potential federalism and constitutional issues. The overarching goal is to provide a starting point for a regulatory regime that can benefit not only society and new entrants, but also ironically, incumbents themselves.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 76
Keywords: cable industry, regulation, competition, law and economics
JEL Classification: K10, L10, L20, L50Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 21, 2003 ; Last revised: February 24, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.906 seconds