Preemption and Products Liability: A Positive Theory
Keith N. Hylton
Boston University; Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law
Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 16, 2008
Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 03-17
In a large number of products liability lawsuits, sellers assert that plaintiffs' claims should be rejected because their products fall under some federal regulatory regime, and that the regulatory statute takes precedence over or preempts state tort law. This paper is an attempt to set out a positive theory of the doctrine on preemption of products liability claims. The federal case law is largely consistent with an approach that seeks to minimize the costs of erroneous decisions to preempt tort lawsuits. In particular, two factors explain many of the outcomes of the preemption cases in federal courts: agency independence and the degree of congruence between the regulatory and common law standards.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Keywords: products liability, preemption, product safety regulation, negligence, strict liability, failure to warn, legislative intent, error costs, design defect, manufacturing defect, fraud on agency
JEL Classification: K0, K13, K41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 13, 2003
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds