Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=436682
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (224)



 


 



Case Studies, Counterfactuals, and Causal Explanations


Gregory Mitchell


University of Virginia School of Law

August 2003

FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 84

Abstract:     
This article critically examines the use of single-observation case studies to develop causal explanations for significant legal events, detailing the evidential and inferential problems inherent in this methodology. Most significant among these problems is that focus on a single case necessitates the use of counterfactual thought experiments to test causal hypotheses. The pitfalls of such thought experiments are illustrated through discussion of recent attempts to explain the collapse of Enron Corporation using this approach. Application of a set of normative criteria to the products of these Enron thought experiments reveals the suspect nature of causal explanations and policy prescriptions drawn from single-observation case studies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 100

Keywords: case study method, counterfactual reasoning, thought experiment, empirical legal research

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 27, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Mitchell, Gregory, Case Studies, Counterfactuals, and Causal Explanations (August 2003). FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 84. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=436682 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.436682

Contact Information

Gregory Mitchell (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
434-243-4088 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,018
Downloads: 422
Download Rank: 38,411
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  224

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds