Strangi: A Critical Analysis and Planning Suggestions
Hofstra University - School of Law
Jonathan G. Blattmachr
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
Tax Notes, Vol. 100, No. 9, September 1, 2003
In Strangi, the Tax Court eliminated all estate tax discounts for a family partnership. It held, as it had in several prior cases, that section 2036(a)(1) required this result. The court then went on to reach the alternative holding that section 2036(a)(2) likewise precluded the estate from claiming a discount. While many have taken steps to address the threat that section 2036(a)(1) poses to these partnerships, few, if any, anticipated the court's alternative holding and the potentially critical threat it poses if sustained. The authors argue that the alternative holding is based on a misreading of the Supreme Court's decision in Byrum and is inconsistent with the Service's own published guidance. They go on to suggest various planning strategies for existing and new partnerships that will neutralize this new threat, concluding that Strangi's alternative holding is not only an imperfect solution for abusive partnership discounts but also nothing more than a trap for the unwary.
Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 6, 2005
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.328 seconds