Advance Directives and Medical Treatment at the End of Life
Daniel P. Kessler
Stanford Graduate School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Mark B. McClellan
Brookings Institution; Council of Economic Advisors; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Stanford Graduate School of Business
NBER Working Paper No. w9955
To assess the consequences of advance medical directives -- which explicitly specify a patient's preferences for one or more specific types of medical treatment in the event of a loss of competence we analyze the medical care of elderly Medicare beneficiaries who died between 1985-1995. We compare the care of patients from states that adopted laws enhancing incentives for compliance with advance directives and laws requiring the appointment of a health care surrogate in the absence of an advance directive to the care of patients from states that did not. We report three key findings. First, laws enhancing incentives for compliance significantly reduce the probability of dying in an acute care hospital. Second, laws requiring the appointment of a surrogate significantly increase the probability of receiving acute care in the last month of life, but decrease the probability of receiving nonacute care. Third, neither type of law leads to any savings in medical expenditures.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29working papers series
Date posted: September 11, 2003
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.484 seconds