Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=442721
 
 

Citations (13)



 
 

Footnotes (484)



 


 



Bargaining in the Shadow of Takeover Defenses


Guhan Subramanian


Harvard Business School

December 2003

Yale Law Journal, Vol. 113, Issue 3, pp. 621-686, December 2003

Abstract:     
Among the arguments that have been put forward to support the view that takeover defenses increase shareholder returns when a company becomes a takeover target, the "bargaining power hypothesis" is the most commonly cited argument today. Under this theory, takeover defenses allow the target to extract more in a negotiated acquisition because the bidder's no-deal alternative, to make a hostile bid, is worsened. Despite its centrality to the current debate on takeover defenses, the bargaining power hypothesis has never been subjected to a careful theoretical analysis or to a comprehensive empirical test. In this Article I present a model of bargaining in the "shadow" of takeover defenses that introduces alternatives away from the table, hostile bid costs, asymmetric information, and agency costs into the standard bargaining model. I confirm the features of this model using interviews with the heads of mergers and acquisitions at ten major New York City investment banks, which collectively account for 96% of U.S. M&A deal volume. I also present econometric evidence that is consistent with this model. The theoretical model, practitioner interviews, and econometric evidence presented here indicate that the bargaining power hypothesis is unlikely to be valid in many if not most negotiated acquisitions. This conclusion has implications for whether defenses increase or decrease shareholder wealth, and whether the recent pro-takeover movements in the Delaware courts will lead to negative consequences for target shareholders in negotiated acquisitions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Keywords: takeover, negotiated acquisitions, mergers and acquisitions, tender offers, takeover defenses, defensive tactics, staggered boards, poison pills, premia

JEL Classification: G34, K22

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 16, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Subramanian, Guhan, Bargaining in the Shadow of Takeover Defenses (December 2003). Yale Law Journal, Vol. 113, Issue 3, pp. 621-686, December 2003 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=442721 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.442721

Contact Information

Guhan Subramanian (Contact Author)
Harvard Business School ( email )
Soldiers Field Road
Morgan 270C
Boston, MA 02163
United States
617-495-9784 (Phone)
617-496-7379 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,704
Downloads: 1,465
Download Rank: 5,702
Citations:  13
Footnotes:  484

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.500 seconds