|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: lp9705312. ; Size: 203K
|
|
Romantic Authorship and the Rhetoric of Property
Mark A. Lemley Stanford Law School
Texas Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 873, 1997
Abstract:
This is a review of James Boyle's new book, Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Boyle's book ranges across the law of information, which he argues should be treated as a unified discipline. Boyle applies his analysis of "romantic authorship" to the law of information, arguing that in copyright and elsewhere, the law gives new works too much protection because it wrongly discounts the sources on which those works necessarily build. In this review, I suggest that whatever its merits as legal argument, "romantic authorship" does not explain very much about the features of copyright law, nor why copyright protection is expanding over time. I suggest an alternative explanation: that a particular strand of law and economics scholarship that endorses strong property rights is pushing for the "propertization" of all valuable information.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50
Accepted Paper Series
Download This Paper
Date posted: May 30, 1997
; Last revised: February 6, 2011
Suggested CitationLemley, Mark A., Romantic Authorship and the Rhetoric of Property. Texas Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 873, 1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=44418 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.44418
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
Paper statistics
Download Rank:
|
12,841
|
|
|
|
|