Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=44418
 
 

Citations (6)



 
 

Footnotes (175)



 


 



Romantic Authorship and the Rhetoric of Property


Mark A. Lemley


Stanford Law School


Texas Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 873, 1997

Abstract:     
This is a review of James Boyle's new book, Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Boyle's book ranges across the law of information, which he argues should be treated as a unified discipline. Boyle applies his analysis of "romantic authorship" to the law of information, arguing that in copyright and elsewhere, the law gives new works too much protection because it wrongly discounts the sources on which those works necessarily build. In this review, I suggest that whatever its merits as legal argument, "romantic authorship" does not explain very much about the features of copyright law, nor why copyright protection is expanding over time. I suggest an alternative explanation: that a particular strand of law and economics scholarship that endorses strong property rights is pushing for the "propertization" of all valuable information.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 30, 1997 ; Last revised: February 6, 2011

Suggested Citation

Lemley, Mark A., Romantic Authorship and the Rhetoric of Property. Texas Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 873, 1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=44418 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.44418

Contact Information

Mark A. Lemley (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 7,234
Downloads: 868
Download Rank: 13,284
Citations:  6
Footnotes:  175

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.296 seconds