Footnotes (3)



The Jurisdiction of Justice: Two Conceptions of Political Morality

Larry Alexander

University of San Diego School of Law

San Diego Law Review, 2004

My topic in this essay is a major fault line within normative theory. More precisely, it is a major fault line within that part of a normative theory that deals with the content of our moral obligations to others. When I refer to moral obligations here, I am referring to those acts that morality demands of us such that it permits force or its threat to be employed to secure those acts. Moral obligations as I use the term are thus candidates for legal enforcement.

I argue that much of what is debated within liberal political/moral theory can be usefully illuminated by dividing liberal conceptions of justice into two major camps. In one camp are those conceptions that are thoroughgoingly impartialist. That is, their impartialism applies to any good over which people might make competing claims. I shall refer to this group of conceptions as Unrestricted Impartialism, or UI.

Opposed to this camp of liberal conceptions of justice is that group of conceptions that limits impartialism to some goods but puts other goods beyond the writ of justice (enforceable morality). I shall call this group of conceptions Restricted Impartialism, or RI.

In this essay, my aim is to paint these two conceptions and their strengths and weaknesses using a very broad brush. In philosophy, the devil is more frequently than not in the details, and broad brush strokes generally obfuscate more than illuminate. Moreover, my metier tends to be fine analytical points and not big picture tableaux. Nonetheless, not only do space limitations preclude in-depth analyses of the conceptions I discuss, but my message is a wholesale rather than retail one, namely, that there is a single and major gulf dividing liberal conceptions of justice into these two distinct camps. Analytical fine points about these conceptions are beside the point.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: normative theory, moral obligations, legal philosophy

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: September 25, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Alexander, Larry, The Jurisdiction of Justice: Two Conceptions of Political Morality. San Diego Law Review, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=446020 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.446020

Contact Information

Lawrence Alexander (Contact Author)
University of San Diego School of Law ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
619-260-2317 (Phone)
619-260-4728 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,062
Downloads: 323
Download Rank: 49,944
Footnotes:  3
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Natural Justice
By Lawrence Solum

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds