Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=447960
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (105)



 


 



The September 11 Victim Compensation Fund: A Circumscribed Response or an Auspicious Model


Robert L. Rabin


Stanford Law School


DePaul Law Review, Vol. 53, 2003

Abstract:     
What are the implications, if any, of the September 11 Victim Compensation Fund of 2001 for the future? Although the tort option was not foreclosed for the victims of Sept. 11, Congress made a serious effort to provide incentives that would channel claims into the no-fault compensation scheme established by the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act. At this distance from the event, it seems appropriate to reflect on whether the Fund, established in the turmoil following the most riveting single-event, mass disaster in the nation's history, should be regarded as a singular response, or as a window for thinking about redress of future victims of terrorist activity - or even, perhaps, victims of criminal violence more generally.

I begin by offering a set of building blocks: three scenarios of terrorist activity considered from the vantage point of recovery in tort. Next, I shift ground to no-fault as an option for addressing these various types of claims, grounding my discussion in a brief recapitulation of the Sept. 11 scheme, as well as the model that emerges from the regulatory gloss provided by the Special Master designated to implement the scheme. In addition, I offer some context by discussing briefly a limited number of alternative no-fault strategies that have been employed in offering redress to the victims of terrorist acts, and more broadly, to victims of criminal violence. Finally, I address a more fundamental question: Can a satisfying principle be articulated for treating those suffering injuries from terrorist acts as a distinct category of beneficiaries? In the end, I conclude that fairness considerations suggest not so much the normative superiority of tort for addressing every manner of personal injury, as the problematic nature of affording special status to victims of terrorism as no-fault claimants, whether in mass calamities or in isolated incidents.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 24, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Rabin, Robert L., The September 11 Victim Compensation Fund: A Circumscribed Response or an Auspicious Model. DePaul Law Review, Vol. 53, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=447960 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.447960

Contact Information

Robert L. Rabin (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
650-723-3073 (Phone)
650-725-0253 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,562
Downloads: 334
Download Rank: 51,206
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  105

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.265 seconds