|
||||
|
||||
Institutional and Non-Institutional Explanations of Economic DifferencesStanley L. EngermanUniversity of Rochester - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Kenneth L. SokoloffUniversity of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) September 2003 NBER Working Paper No. w9989 Abstract: Although we cannot conceive of processes of economic growth that do not involve institutional change, in this essay we outline some reasons why one should be cautious about grounding a theory of growth on institutions. We emphasize how very different institutional structures have often been found to be reasonable substitutes for each other, both in dissimilar as well as similar contexts. The historical record, therefore, does not seem to support the notion that any particular institution, narrowly defined, is indispensable for growth. Moreover, we discuss how the evidence that there are systematic patterns to the ways institutions evolve undercuts the idea that exogenous change in institutions is what powers growth. Institutions matter, but our thinking of how they matter should recognize that they are profoundly influenced by the political and economic environment, and that if any aspect of institutions is crucial for growth, it is that institutions change over time as circumstances change.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46 working papers seriesDate posted: September 28, 2003Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.953 seconds