Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=451582
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (272)



 


 



Liability Rules for Constitutional Rights: The Case of Mass Detentions


Eugene Kontorovich


Northwestern University Law School


George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-45

Abstract:     
Constitutional law assumes that rights should always be protected by property rules - that is, the government can only take them with the individual's consent. This Article extends to constitutional law the insights of Calabresi and Melamed's famous article on property and liability rules. Whether rights should be protected by property rules or liability rules depends on the transaction costs of negotiating a transfer of rights. As transaction costs rise, liability rules become more attractive.

This Article shows that liability rules can have an important role in constitutional law. Using mass detentions in national security emergencies as a case study, it shows that property rule protection of individual rights sometimes leads to perverse and inefficient results. While the government has repeatedly resorted to mass detentions in emergencies, the Court has never blocked such measures. This is a perverse result of constitutional law's insistence on property rule protection even when transaction costs of transferring liberty rights become extraordinarily high. Holding that a policy violates rights would require, under a property rule, enjoining potentially vital security measures. The Court is unwilling to impose such costs on society. Thus it simply avoids finding that mass detentions violate rights. This creates large groups of uncompensated victims, who are often members of vulnerable ethnic minorities. It also stunts and distorts the development of constitutional law.

Switching to liability rules in mass detention situations can, counterintuitively, result in greater redress for detainees, as well as deterring detentions and preserving the integrity and predictability of substantive law. Furthermore, the transaction cost analysis developed in this Article has implications that extend beyond mass detentions to a variety of other constitutional contexts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 80

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 2, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Kontorovich, Eugene, Liability Rules for Constitutional Rights: The Case of Mass Detentions. George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-45. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=451582 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.451582

Contact Information

Eugene Kontorovich (Contact Author)
Northwestern University Law School ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
(212) 503-0429 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,603
Downloads: 158
Download Rank: 111,133
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  272

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.344 seconds