Welfare Magnets: The Race for the Top
F. H. Buckley
George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty
Margaret F. Brinig
Notre Dame Law School
June 28, 1996
Race to the bottom explanations of welfare policies suggest that the power to set welfare payouts should be assigned to the federal government. Such theories predict that states cut benefits levels when faced with an increased demand for welfare from welfare migrants. This Article's econometric study of the determinants of AFDC payouts finds no evidence that states react in this way. This suggests that states should be accorded the power to curtail welfare payments to new arrivals through residency requirements, an issue left as moot in Anderson v. Green.
JEL Classification: I38, J61, H53, H72
Date posted: January 28, 1997
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds