SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (109)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Formalism, Pragmatism, and the Conservative Critique of the Eleventh Amendment

Michael E. Solimine
University of Cincinnati - College of Law



Michigan Law Review, Vol. 101, 2003

Abstract:     
This essay reviews John T. Noonan, Jr., Narrowing the Nation's Power: The Supreme Court Sides With the States (Berkeley, University of California Press 2002). Judge Noonan's monograph is a critical review, by a well-known jurist, considered conservative in most circles, of the federalism decisions of the Rehnquist Court. Part I of the essay surveys Noonan's arguments, focusing mainly on his critique of the Eleventh Amendment cases. Liberal academics have been sharply critical of those cases. Part II considers what the position of conservatives has been, or should be, on those cases, especially given that the cases largely ignore interpretative methodologies favored by conservatives in other cases. The first two parts of the essay are mainly concerned with formalist arguments. Drawing on arguments made by Noonan, the third and fourth parts engage in a more pragmatic critique of the cases. Part III considers why the Rehnquist Court has seemingly decided so many cases raising Eleventh Amendment issues, and suggests that one of the reasons is the activism of state attorneys general in aggressively litigating the cases, as parties amici curiae, in the Supreme Court. An empirical study of the states' amicus-activity in such cases is presented. Part IV revisits additional rationales for, and empirical effects of, the Eleventh Amendment cases. With regard to the former, the essay addresses whether current doctrine has some functional justifications. With regard to the latter, the essay revisits claims that gaping exceptions to the doctrine, taken together with the purported availability of state law remedies, considerably ameliorates the supposed negative effects of the doctrine on the enforcement of federal law. The essay's conclusion briefly outlines an alternative path the conservative Justices could have, and perhaps should have, taken in shaping Eleventh Amendment doctrine.

Keywords: Federalism, Eleventh Amendment

JEL Classifications: K40

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: October 21, 2003 ; Last revised: October 27, 2003

Suggested Citation

Solimine, Michael E., Formalism, Pragmatism, and the Conservative Critique of the Eleventh Amendment. Michigan Law Review, Vol. 101, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=460341 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.460341


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Michael E. Solimine (Contact Author)
University of Cincinnati - College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210040
Cincinnati, OH 45221-0040
United States
513-556-0102 (Phone)
513-556-1236 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,837
Downloads: 119
Download Rank: 68,955
Footnotes: 109

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 4 in 0.125 seconds.