Citations (4)


Footnotes (67)



Bankruptcy Decisionmaking: An Empirical Study of Continuation Bias in Small Business Bankruptcies

Edward R. Morrison

Columbia Law School

January 25, 2006

Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 239

Over half of all small businesses reorganizing under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code are ultimately liquidated. Little is known about this shutdown decision and about the factors that increase or reduce the amount of time a firm spends in bankruptcy. It is widely suspected, however, that the Chapter 11 process exhibits a "continuation bias," allowing non-viable firms to linger under the protection of the court. This paper tests for the presence of continuation bias in the docket of a typical bankruptcy court over the course of a calendar year. A variety of tests are employed, including the extent to which entrenched managers dominate the bankruptcy process, the accuracy and speed with which viable and nonviable firms are distinguished, and the extent to which the hazard of shutdown is consistent with the implications of a simple, formal model of the optimal Chapter 11 process. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the paper finds that continuation bias is either absent or empirically unimportant.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 61

Keywords: Bankruptcy, Corporate Reorganization, Optimal Timing, Judicial Decisionmaking

JEL Classification: K20, K40, G33, L20, D92

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 28, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Morrison, Edward R., Bankruptcy Decisionmaking: An Empirical Study of Continuation Bias in Small Business Bankruptcies (January 25, 2006). Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 239. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=880101 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.461031

Contact Information

Edward R. Morrison (Contact Author)
Columbia Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,857
Downloads: 747
Download Rank: 22,705
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  67

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.750 seconds