Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=462520
 
 

Footnotes (130)



 


 



Morals Legislation and the Establishment Clause


Arnold H. Loewy


Texas Tech University School of Law


Alabama Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
In my essay entitled "Morals Legislation and the Establishment Clause," I argue that in Lawrence v. Texas, the Court correctly concluded that morality alone was not enough to justify legislation. Unlike, the Court, I predicate that conclusion on the Establishment Clause. In my view, morals legislation should be divided into two types: Morality simpliciter and purposive morality. Purposive morality, i.e., morality predicated on a legitimate secular rationale, presents no Establishment Clause problem. But morality simpliciter, i.e. that which is immoral simply because somebody says it is immoral, violates the Establishment Clause.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 7, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Loewy, Arnold H., Morals Legislation and the Establishment Clause. Alabama Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=462520 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.462520

Contact Information

Arnold H. Loewy (Contact Author)
Texas Tech University School of Law ( email )
1802 Hartford
Lubbock, TX 79409
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,882
Downloads: 151
Download Rank: 118,183
Footnotes:  130

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds