|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id462520. ; Size: 80K
|
|
Morals Legislation and the Establishment Clause
Arnold H. Loewy Texas Tech University School of Law
Alabama Law Review, Forthcoming
Abstract:
In my essay entitled "Morals Legislation and the Establishment Clause," I argue that in Lawrence v. Texas, the Court correctly concluded that morality alone was not enough to justify legislation. Unlike, the Court, I predicate that conclusion on the Establishment Clause. In my view, morals legislation should be divided into two types: Morality simpliciter and purposive morality. Purposive morality, i.e., morality predicated on a legitimate secular rationale, presents no Establishment Clause problem. But morality simpliciter, i.e. that which is immoral simply because somebody says it is immoral, violates the Establishment Clause.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29
Accepted Paper Series
Download This Paper
Date posted: November 7, 2003
Suggested CitationLoewy, Arnold H., Morals Legislation and the Establishment Clause. Alabama Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=462520 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.462520
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
|
|
|
|