Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=463226
 
 

Citations (7)



 
 

Footnotes (196)



 


 



The Market for Contingent Fee-Financed Tort Litigation: Is It Price Competitive?


Lester Brickman


Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law


Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 25, 2003

Abstract:     
Tort liability has undergone an enormous expansion in the past 40 years. So too has the effective hourly rate obtained by plaintiff lawyers which has increased well over 1000% in that time frame (adjusted for inflation). That the enormous increases in effective hourly rates parallel the enormous expansion in tort liability raises a number of issues. In this article, I examine one of them: whether the market for contingent fee-financing of tort litigation is price competitive. To do so, I examine certain indicia of a noncompetitive market including the fact of uniform pricing, the absence of economic justification for uniform pricing such as reductions in agency costs or transactional costs, inelasticity of the price in light of highly variable production costs and the absence of price advertising. I then examine factors which inhibit the emergence of a price competitive market including asymmetrical knowledge, the utility of uniform pricing in misleading consumers as to risk, and the signaling function of uniform pricing. I then examine the reasons for the persistence of uniform pricing in the face of the predictions of economists applying standard economic theory that some lawyers would undercut standard pricing thereby generating competitive behavior that would more closely align pricing with risk and the variable cost of producing the service. I attribute the persistence of uniform pricing to market failures and analyze the reasons for such failures. Finally, I examine the actions of the bar designed to prevent a competitive market from emerging. These actions include the maintenance of barriers to entry into the tort claiming market, prohibitions against the outright purchase of tort claims and adoption of rules of ethics effectively prohibiting price competition including prohibitions against providing financial assistance to clients and brokerage of lawyers' services for profit.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 30, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Brickman, Lester, The Market for Contingent Fee-Financed Tort Litigation: Is It Price Competitive?. Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 25, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=463226 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.463226

Contact Information

Lester Brickman (Contact Author)
Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0327 (Phone)
212-790-0205 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,705
Downloads: 725
Download Rank: 18,095
Citations:  7
Footnotes:  196

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.265 seconds