|
||||
|
||||
Monitoring and Controlling Bank Risk: Does Risky Debt Help?
C. N. V. Krishnan Case Western Reserve University - Department of Banking & Finance Peter H. Ritchken Case Western Reserve University - Department of Banking & Finance James B. Thomson Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland AFA 2004 San Diego Meetings; FRB of Cleveland Working Paper No. 0301 Abstract: We examine whether mandating banks to issue subordinated debt would enhance market monitoring and control risk taking. To evaluate whether subordinated debt enhances risk monitoring, we extract the credit-spread curve for each banking firm in our sample and examine whether changes in credit spreads reflect changes in bank risk variables, after controlling for changes in market and liquidity variables. We do not find strong and consistent evidence that they do. To evaluate whether subordinated debt controls risk taking, we examine whether the first issue of subordinated debt changes the risk-taking behavior of a bank. We find that it does not. We conclude that a mandatory subordinated debt requirement for banks is unlikely to provide the purported benefits of enhancing risk monitoring or controlling risk taking.
Keywords: Bank risk, Estimation of credit spread Curves, Determinants of credit spread changes JEL Classifications: G12, G21 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 08, 2004 ; Last revised: November 13, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.172 seconds.